Register | Login
Intellectual Property Today
RFC Express - Document Management System

Would Derivation Proceedings Be The Same As Derivation Interferences?1

By Charles L. Gholz2


It has been generally assumed that the “derivation proceedings” that would be created by both the House and Senate versions of the Patent Reform Act of 20094 would simply be derivation interferences by another name.  However, a close reading of the relevant portions of the two bills reveals that there would be a few significant differences--some clearly intended and some probably not intended.  In this article I will comment on what I see as the important differences between the two proceedings.  I solicit comments from readers—both comments disagreeing with my analysis and comments asserting that there are additional significant differences between the two proceedings.

Is an Applicant Winner of a Derivation Proceeding Automatically Entitled to Obtain a Patent?

An applicant winner of a derivation interference is clearly not automatically entitled to obtain a patent.  Its application is returned to the examining corps for post-interference ex parte prosecution, and the examiner to whom it is assigned is at perfect liberty to enter one or more new grounds of rejection, starting the whole process over.5  The theory is that the interference det...

To view the complete article you must be logged in
Login Now

Not A Member Yet? Sign Up For A Free 10 Day Trial Account!

  © Copyright 2010 Intellectual Property Today
Download Adobe Reader for free