By Ronald Slusky
 |
Ronald Slusky mentored dozens of attorneys in "old school" invention analysis and claiming principles over a 31-year career at Bell Laboratories. He is now in private practice in New York City, and can be reached at 212-246-4546 and rdslusky@verizon.net..
This article is adapted from Ron's 2007 book "Invention Analysis and Claiming: A Patent Lawyer's Guide," which serves as the foundation for his CLE-accredited two-day seminar for patent practitioners. www.sluskyseminars.com
|
There are as many approaches to analyzing inventions as there are practitioners plying this trade. The analysis of virtually any invention can therefore invariably be enhanced by discussing it with a colleague. Inevitably a co-worker will have offer one or more questions or insights that can shed further light on the problem and/or the solution.
This month's column presents some invention-identification ideas that a number of practicing patent attorneys have shared with the author.2 Their approaches coalesce into a few thematic strands, which echo many of the ideas that appears in this space. We are, after all, all focused...