Register | Login
Intellectual Property Today
RFC Express - Document Management System

Using 35 USC 154(d) to Speed Interferences1

By Charles L. Gholz2 and Vincent K. Shier 3


If an interference is won by an applicant interferent and the losing party seeks court review of the board's decision, it is the PTO's normal practice to withhold issuance of the winning party's application pending completion of all court review—including disposition of a petition for certiorari.4 Since the prevailing applicant-interferent can't file an infringement action against the losing patentee-interferent until its patent has issued, and since normal infringement damages don't begin accumulating until the patent has issued, this sometimes leads to patentee-interferents' stretching out even hopeless cases as long as possible.

It is the thesis of this article that applicant-interferents can use 35 USC 154(d) to considerably reduce (but not to eliminate) the incentive of patentee-interferents to engage in this socially dysfunctional behavior.

What 35 USC 154(d) Says—And How It Impacts Interferences


To view the complete article you must be logged in
Login Now

Not A Member Yet? Sign Up For A Free 10 Day Trial Account!

  © Copyright 2012 Intellectual Property Today
Download Adobe Reader for free